Associate
Julian Fenech Adami
Julian Fenech Adami
Julian Fenech Adami is an Associate at Mamo TCV Advocates. He joined the firm as a trainee in September 2016.
After graduating in 2018 with a Doctor of Laws, Julian began practicing Immigration law as his main area, advising clients on a wide range of immigration matters such as citizenship by birth, naturalization, registration or investment, multiple residency programmes based on tax, retirement and investment, visas, and work-based residency such as the single permit and the nomad residence permit.
In view of the close link between work permits and other aspects of employment law, and his keen interest in yachting, Julian also advises numerous corporate clients and individuals on employment law, shipping and yachting.
Education
- Bachelor of Laws, LL.B. (2015, University of Malta)
- Diploma of Legal Procurator (2015, University of Malta)
- Diploma of Notary Public (2016, University of Malta)
- Doctor of Laws, LL.D. (2018, University of Malta)
Get In Touch
Address
MAMO TCV Advocates
Palazzo Pietro Stiges
103, Strait Street
Valletta, VLT 1436
Malta
Stay updated with our latest insights
Dr Nicholas Valenzia attending the Monaco Yacht Show
Dr Nicholas Valenzia, Head of the Shipping and Yachting practice group at Mamo TCV Advocates, is currently attending the Monaco Yacht Show taking place between the 27th September and 30th September, 2023. Feel free to get in touch directly to set an appointment.
Society Education Employment Law Seminar
Society Education shall once again be organising the yearly employment law seminar, which shall be held online on the 24th and 27th of October. Dr Christine Calleja and Dr Martina Bonnici, shall be participating in this year’s seminar with the following topics: occupational health and safety and whistleblowing legislation. The seminar will be moderated by Dr Christine Calleja.
Court of Appeal Rejects Employee’s Claim of Unfair Dismissal
On the 15th of September 2023, the Court of Appeal (Inferior Jurisdiction) (Appeal Number: 155/2022 LM) reversed the Industrial Tribunal’s decision that had previously considered that the plaintiff had been unfairly dismissed from his employment with a bank. The Court was tasked with deciding on the employee’s allegations during proceedings which primarily related to claiming discriminatory treatment and unfair dismissal. The employee had embarked on a year-long career break during his employment with the bank after having first obtained permission from management in compliance with the Collective Agreement then in place. The bone of contention revolved around the way in…
