Associate
Daniela Bugeja
Daniela Bugeja
Daniela Bugeja is an Associate at Mamo TCV Advocates. She graduated Doctor of Laws from the University of Malta in 2003 after submitting a doctoral thesis entitled ‘The Protection of Young Workers under the Maltese, European and International Legal Regimes – A Comparative Analysis. She went on to obtain a Diploma in Marriage Cases, Jurisprudence and Procedure.
Daniela was called to the Bar in May 2004 and was an associate with Dr. Leslie Cuschieri & Associates from June 2004 to December 2007 as well as an in-house lawyer with Dionica R &D from May 2004 to December 2005; Daniela then moved on to set up a law firm with a fellow lawyer, under the name Buttigieg & Mangion Advocates and was a Partner from January 2008 to August 2016; Between January 2007 to December 2010 Daniela was lawyer to the Kummissjoni Nazzjonali Persuni b’ Diżabilita’; She also was appointed Judicial Assistant on a part-time basis in 2008, position she holds to-date; an Associate with Gonzi & Associate Advocates from November 2017 to June 2022; In April 2023 Daniela joined Mamo TCV as Of Counsel and in July 2023 she became an Associate.
Daniela forms part of the litigation practice of the firm. Daniela’s area of specialization is Civil and Criminal Litigation with particular emphasis on Civil Litigation focusing on Tort and Quasi Tort, Property Law and extra-judicial matters namely drafting of private agreements and lease contracts, Debt Collecting, the Law on Sale, Contract Law, and Obligations in general. In the area of Criminal Litigation, Daniela has a wide experience since previously she handled a variety of cases revolving around matters affecting Public Trust, namely fraud and forgery, Crimes against the person and in particular slight and grievous bodily harm, Crimes against Property and Public Safety particularly Simple and Aggravated Theft as well as a considerable number of Drug cases invoking Drugs Laws and particularly Drug Trafficking and cases on Money Laundering.
She is a member of the Chamber of Advocates.
Education
- B.A. Legal & Humanistic Studies (2000, University of Malta)
- Diploma of Notary Public (2001, University of Malta)
- Doctor of Laws (2003, University of Malta)
- Diploma in Marriage Cases, Jurisprudence and Procedure (2005, Malta Episcopal Conference)
Memberships
- Admitted to the Bar, Superior Courts of Malta (2004)
Get In Touch
Address
MAMO TCV Advocates
Palazzo Pietro Stiges
103, Strait Street
Valletta, VLT 1436
Malta
Stay updated with our latest insights
Decision on the Quantum of Rent Payable
In a judgment decided on the 26th of June 2024 in the names Marcus Scicluna Marshall et vs Michael Borg Cardona, the Court of Appeal in its Inferior Jurisdiction confirmed that no appeal can be filed from the rate established by the Rent Regulation Board to increase the rent for leases predating the year 1995. Act XXIV of 2021, which introduced amendments to the laws on protected residential leases, gave the right to lessors who are bound by lease agreements with respect to dwelling houses predating 1st June 1995 to request an increase in the rent payable that is calculated…
Employer Liability Leads to Over €200,000 in Damages
In a landmark judgment delivered on the 14th of March 2024 in the names Maria Matruscelli vs Palumbo Malta Shipyards Limited et (case numbered 518/19TA), the First Hall of the Civil Court awarded €208,871 in compensation to the plaintiff. The case revolved around the death of Aniello Fariello who lost his life on the 18th of January 2016 while performing his duties on board the vessel MV Galaxy, which vessel was docked at the shipyard belonging to Palumbo Shipyards Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Palumbo”). During the process of mooring the vessel, a reel through which one of the ropes…
Commercial Court’s Landmark Decision: Redefining Impracticability in Corporate Governance
In the case 44/2023/ISB delivered on 6th October 2023, the applicant, a majority shareholder in a company requested the Civil Court (Commercial Section) to fix a date for an extraordinary general meeting of the company under Art 132(1) of the Companies Act in an attempt to remove two directors from the Board of Directors without adequately proposing replacements. Such a move could push the company into a precarious state of regulatory non-compliance, endangering its very existence as it may lose its operational license. These consequences also undermine the minority shareholder’s decade long commitment which contributed to the company’s consistent profitability,…
